The Universal
The concept of the Universal, often explored in philosophy and various intellectual disciplines, encompasses the timeless and fundamental principles, truths, or essences that transcend individual instances and contribute to our understanding of the world and our place within it.
Fundamentals Transcends all societies
It is timeless
The concept of the Universal has persisted throughout the ages, shaping our understanding of timeless truths and principles. In the past, philosophers like Plato and Parmenides delved into the nature of universals as eternal and transcendent forms. In the present, the Universal continues to guide our exploration of objective standards and fundamental realities. Looking to the future, the concept of the Universal will likely remain a subject of philosophical inquiry, providing a framework for seeking timeless truths that transcend individual perspectives and temporal boundaries.
But if ignored
We descend to Hell
Ignoring universal values leads to moral decay and social division.
Unfortunately, in today’s society, morality and the concepts of right and wrong are often dismissed as mere religious dogmas, considered outdated and irrelevant to modern life. Some argue that morality is subjective, varying from person to person based on individual perspectives. This belief suggests that there is no universal definition of right conduct, leading to a loss of authenticity and inhibiting our pursuit of true happiness. However, this perspective is fundamentally flawed. To illustrate, imagine a world where everyone consistently made false promises for personal gain. Such a world would be akin to one where 2 + 1 equals 5. The very essence of making a promise would be negated, as widespread dishonesty would erode trust, rendering promises meaningless. In such a society, functioning as a cohesive unit would become nearly impossible, resulting in an uncomfortable and disordered existence.
Moral compasses cannot be ignored.
Universal values, such as Natural Law, serve as moral compasses that guide human behavior and provide a foundation for ethical decision-making. Ignoring these values can lead to a loss of moral clarity, resulting in a society where individuals and institutions operate without a shared understanding of right and wrong. This can lead to moral relativism, where personal preferences and subjective opinions dictate ethical choices, ultimately undermining the cohesion and stability of society, eventually underpin the recognition and protection of human dignity and rights. Ignoring these values can lead to a devaluation of human life, an erosion of individual freedoms, and the marginalization of vulnerable groups. Without the anchoring principles of Natural Law, societal norms and laws may become arbitrary and subject to the whims of those in power, potentially leading to oppression, injustice, and the violation of basic human rights.
The end result makes for an uncomfortable place to live.
One does not have to look further than the 20th century, a time where societal conflicts escalated to apocalyptic proportions. Millions upon millions were tossed into the caldrons that subjectivity prepared for them. Either they were killed by a strong minority that benefited particulars (Nazi Germany), or everyone in society suffered (and continue to) from social instability and illegitimacy of governance, which impedes institutions to effectively serve the needs of the people (many South American nations).
Without a moral foundation, societal progress may become detached from the principles that ensure long-term sustainability and the well-being of future generations.
- Finnis, J. (2011). Natural law theories. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-law-theories/
- Grisez, G. (1983). The first principle of practical reason: A commentary on the Summa Theologiae, 1-2, question 94, article 2. The Thomist, 47(4), 501-538.
- Institute on Religion and Public Life. (2020). Natural Law: A Lutheran Reappraisal. Retrieved from https://www.firstthings.com/article/2020/08/natural-law-a-lutheran-reappraisal
- Lewis, C. S. (1943). The Abolition of Man. Oxford University Press.
- Velasquez, M., Andre, C., Shanks, T., & Meyer, M. J. (2020). Thinking ethically: A framework for moral decision-making. Issues in Ethics, 31(1). Retrieved from https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/thinking-ethically-a-framework-for-moral-decision-making/